Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580485›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Water quality index prediction via a robust machine learning model using oxygen-related indices for river water quality monitoring.

Amin Arzhangi, Sadegh Partani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amin ArzhangiFaculty of Engineering, Civil Engineering Department, University of Bojnord, Northern Khorasan, Iran.
Sadegh PartaniFaculty of Engineering, Civil Engineering Department, University of Bojnord, Northern Khorasan, Iran. s_partani@ub.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rivers face increasing pollution, requiring accurate water quality assessment tools. Existing indices like the Water Quality Index (WQI) often overlook the integration of oxygen-related parameters critical to aquatic health. Here, we develop a machine learning model using Support Vector Regression (SVR) to predict the Water Quality Index (WQIOIs) by integrating key oxygen-related parameters, including Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Dissolved Oxygen (DO), and the reaeration coefficients (K1, K2). Applied to three rivers in Iran, the model demonstrated high accuracy, with a cross-validated R² > 0.95 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.92 for the Haraz River and 1.41 for the Simineh River. Predictions showed strong correlation (r = 0.98) with standard indices, and feature importance analysis revealed DO as the most influential parameter. The model’s generalizability was confirmed through validation on independent river datasets, highlighting its robustness across diverse hydrological conditions. This approach offers a scalable, interpretable framework for continuous water quality monitoring, enabling more precise and data-driven management of aquatic ecosystems, particularly in regions with varying environmental factors.

Indexed as

Biological oxygen demand (BOD)Chemical oxygen demand (COD)Environmental monitoringOxygen-related indicesRiver water qualitySupport vector regression (SVR), reaeration coefficient (K2)Water quality index (WQI)

Identifiers

PMID41580485
PMCPMC12902110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.