ArticleCommunications biology2026
Neural mechanisms of feature binding in working memory.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a fundamental cognitive system with limited capacity, working memory (WM) strategically binds various features together to enhance its efficiency. However, the neural mechanisms governing feature binding in WM remain unsettled. Here, we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging combined with graph-based network analysis during a WM task in which participants maintained both color and location information throughout the delay period and subsequently detected and reported changes in color-location bindings versus individual features. Our results revealed a collaborative network that operates through a central workspace encompassing the somatomotor area, insula, and prefrontal cortex, underpinning the effective processing of bindings. Within these regions, we observed increased local efficiency and stronger connections during feature binding. Notably, connections within this workspace significantly correlated with behavioral performance. Among these regions, the somatomotor area, characterized by a shorter intrinsic timescale, responded more rapidly to visual input, carrying rich temporal information with more connections, and potentially served as the starting point during binding processes. These results highlight a dedicated workspace with sufficient and valid internal connections, facilitating successful binding through collaborative regional interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.