Observational studyScientific reports2026
Lung ultrasound B-line quantification in CTD-ILD: a cross-sectional single-center observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic and clinical relevance of quantitative lung ultrasound (LUS) score in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), and to determine its correlation with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) severity, pulmonary function, and laboratory parameters. The cross-sectional, single-center observational study enrolled patients with connective tissue diseases who had confirmed interstitial lung disease and underwent both HRCT and LUS within 7 days of evaluation. Lung ultrasound was performed using a 12-zone scanning protocol, and B-lines were quantified to derive a semi-quantitative LUS-B score representing subpleural interstitial involvement. ILD severity categories were defined based on HRCT Warrick scores as mild (0–7), moderate (8–15), and severe (> 15). Pulmonary function tests and laboratory parameters, including inflammatory and immune-related markers, were collected. Correlations between LUS-B score, HRCT severity, pulmonary function, and laboratory variables were analyzed, and multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between LUS-B score and ILD severity categories. Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC analysis. 117 patients with CTD-ILD (mean age 57 ± 12 years; 74% female) were enrolled. The cohort included patients with Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) (n = 32), systemic sclerosis (SSc) (n = 18), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 16), idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM)/anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) (n = 27), as well as other CTDs (n = 24), including systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 6), ANCA-associated vasculitis (n = 5), and undifferentiated connective tissue disease (n = 13). LUS scores showed a negative correlation with force expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (rs = − 0.214, P = 0.03) and a positive correlation with HRCT Warrick scores (rs = 0.304, P = 0.001). An exploratory cut-off value of 7 for the LUS score was determined using the Youden index. Group comparisons based on this threshold showed patients with higher LUS scores showed greater HRCT severity (Z = − 2.503, P = 0.012), lower FEV1 (Z = − 3.128, P = 0.002) and FVC (Z = − 2.335, P = 0.020) ratios, and higher CD4⁺ T cell levels (Z = − 2.144, P = 0.032). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the correlation between LUS and HRCT score was strongest in Sjögren’s-syndrome-associated ILD (rs = 0.417, P = 0.018), whereas other CTD subtypes showed weaker or nonsignificant associations. In multivariable logistic regression, parameters entered a priori (age, sex, LUS score, DLco, hemoglobin, and baseline pulmonary disease) identified LUS (OR = 0.87, P = 0.016) and DLco (OR = 1.12, P < 0.001) as independent correlates of ILD severity. ROC analysis based on HRCT-defined severity demonstrated that the LUS score had moderate discriminatory ability for severe ILD (AUC = 0.642, sensitivity = 86%, specificity = 42%); however, combining LUS with DLco significantly improved severity stratification. Quantitative LUS score provides a reproducible, non-invasive assessment of ILD burden and correlates moderately with HRCT severity and pulmonary function impairment in CTD-ILD. LUS demonstrated its greatest value in identifying severe ILD, particularly in Sjögren’s syndrome, whereas its ability to distinguish intermediate severity was limited. When combined with DLco, its stratification performance improved. Thus, LUS serves as a complementary bedside tool to HRCT for evaluating disease burden and risk in CTD-ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.