ArticleScientific reports2026
Network analysis of emotion regulation and moral injury symptoms among medical staff.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current research indicates that medical staff frequently experience potentially morally injurious events, leading to moral injury (MI), which is associated with adverse physical and mental health as well as occupational burnout. Using the conceptual model of MI, this study investigated the symptom-level connections between distinct emotion regulation (ER) strategies—cognitive reappraisal (CR) and expressive suppression (ES)—and MI symptoms among medical staff. Using network analysis, we assessed ER capacities and MI symptoms in a sample of 1,001 medical staff. An ER-MI network was constructed to depict the interplay between these variables, with additional analysis examining gender and professional differences in the ER-MI network characteristics. Results revealed that cognitive reappraisal was negatively correlated with various MI symptoms, while expressive suppression was positively correlated. Several critical connections were identified, such as connections between cognitive reappraisal and Loss of faith, cognitive reappraisal and Loss of trust, and ES and Feeling betrayed. Bridge centrality metrics indicated that cognitive reappraisal had a negative bridge expected influence (BEI) value, whereas expressive suppression had a positive BEI value. Network comparison tests revealed significant gender differences on two specific between-community connections: between cognitive reappraisal and Feeling betrayed and between cognitive reappraisal and Self-condemnation. There was no significant professional difference in ER-MI network characteristics in the current study. These findings may provide novel perspectives for understanding MI through the lens of ER and highlight potential targets for prevention and intervention strategies aimed at medical staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.