ArticleScientific reports2026
Sickle cell disease detection in low-resource conditions using transfer-learning and contrastive-learning coupled with XAI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microscopic image enhancement for accurate sickle cell disease identification using intuitionistic fuzzy driven retinex.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a severe hereditary blood disorder that affects millions worldwide, necessitating early and accurate detection to improve patient outcomes. State-of-the-art approaches for automatic detection of SCD use deep learning (DL) based models, which require a large amount of training data for efficient training. However, such large training datasets are often not available, significantly limiting the efficiency of DL-based models. In this paper, we propose different approaches to address this issue. Firstly, we propose to use a transfer-learning based approach, where we use pre-trained models like ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, and EfficientNet-B0 and fine-tune them for SCD detection. To further enhance the efficiency of the models, we then propose to include contrastive-learning-based approach using triplet loss. We also use focal loss to handle class imbalance. Additionally, we integrate Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methodologies to interpret and explain the model's predictions, ensuring transparency and trustworthiness in clinical settings. Experiments on a publicly available SCD image dataset show that models trained with transfer learning and triplet loss outperform those trained with binary cross-entropy or focal loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.