ArticleJournal of molecular biology2026
ModelCIF Update: Supporting Emerging Classes of Computational Macromolecular Models.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent development of highly accurate protein structure prediction tools has led to a rapid expansion in the scope of computational structural biology, enabling a much wider range of modelling studies than ever before. These new in silico opportunities help life science researchers understand how proteins interact with their environment and support design of new molecules with desired properties. Ultimately, they have broad applications, e.g. in medicine, drug discovery or engineering. To ensure reproducibility and to facilitate data exchange and reuse, predicted structures or computed structure models can be stored using ModelCIF, a rich data representation designed to include the atomic coordinates/metadata. The previously published version of ModelCIF (1.4.4; 2022-12-21) mainly covered protein structure predictions generated by homology and ab initio modelling. In this work, we present an extension of the ModelCIF (https://github.com/ihmwg/ModelCIF) data standard and its associated tools. This extension supports important new use cases, including modelling protein-ligand and protein-protein interactions, sampling multiple conformational states and designing proteins de novo. We define guidelines for storage and validation of modelling results for those use cases by applying new and existing ModelCIF categories to capture protocols, inputs and outputs. Additionally, we outline updates to the software tools and resources that implement these new standards and provide functionality for model generation, validation, archiving, and visualisation. By enabling consistent metadata capture across different modelling workflows, this framework aims to support the FAIR dissemination of computational models, thereby promoting reproducibility and reusability in downstream applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.