Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2026
Safety and efficacy of crenezumab in cognitively unimpaired carriers of the PSEN1
Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Beyond the Cochrane review: Re-evaluating anti-amyloid therapy in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo have maximal benefit, Alzheimer's disease-modifying treatments might need to be started before the onset of clinical symptoms. Mutations of the PSEN1 gene are inherited as fully penetrant, autosomal-dominant traits, which almost always result in the clinical onset of Alzheimer's disease before the age of 65 years. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, including possible delayed emergence of cognitive impairment, and safety of crenezumab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody, in cognitively unimpaired carriers of the PSEN1
methodsThis 5-8-year common-close, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre trial screened kindred members aged 30-60 years from the main health-care site in Medellín, Colombia. Participants who were cognitively unimpaired and carried the PSEN1
findings619 Colombian API registrants were prescreened, 315 were assessed for eligibility, and 252 were enrolled (crenezumab-carrier, n=85; placebo-carrier, n=84; placebo-non-carrier, n=83; 160 [63%] women and 92 [37%] men) between Dec 20, 2013, and Feb 27, 2017. 237 (94%) completed the trial, with final data collection on March 22, 2022. The annualised rate of change in the API ADAD composite was -1·10 (SE 0·29) in the crenezumab group and -1·43 (0·29) in the placebo group (between-group difference 0·33 [95% CI -0·48 to 1·13]; p=0·43). The annualised rate of change in FCSRT-CI was -0·03 (0·00) in the crenezumab group and -0·04 (0·00) in the placebo group (between-group difference 0·01 [0·00 to 0·02]; p=0·16). All participants had at least one adverse event; serious adverse events occurred in 23 (27%) of 84 in the crenezumab group and 21 (25%) of 84 in the placebo group. No fatalities occurred.
interpretationCrenezumab therapy administered for 5-8 years did not result in significant benefits on our primary clinical outcomes in cognitively unimpaired participants predisposed to developing ADAD dementia; secondary and exploratory outcomes also showed no significant effect on removal of amyloid plaques or other clinical or biomarker outcomes. Together with the results of other anti-amyloid β trials, robust fibrillar amyloid removal appears necessary for clinical efficacy in people with elevated brain amyloid. This study will further inform the biomarker, cognitive, and clinical trajectory of preclinical ADAD, the risk of clinical progression in amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative mutation carriers, and the size and design of future secondary and primary prevention trials.
fundingUS National Institute on Aging (NIA), Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Genentech, F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.