Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41579744›Full record

ArticleEvaluation and program planning2026

Development and testing of an evidence-informed structured survey tool for planning tailored technical assistance.

Sarah Moreland-Russell, Jessica Gannon, Kim Prewitt, Louise Farah Saliba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evaluation and program planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah Moreland-RussellPrevention Research Center, School of Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63116, United States. Electronic address: smoreland-russell@wustl.edu.
Jessica GannonPrevention Research Center, School of Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63116, United States.
Kim PrewittCenter for Public Health Systems Science, School of Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63116, United States.
Louise Farah SalibaNorthwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.

Funding

ESTABLISHING THE PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLANNING TRAINING MODELR01CA203844 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORELAND-RUSSELL, SARAH · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technical assistance (TA) provides training to improve program development or implementation. This study developed an evidence-informed TA survey tool for planning tailored TA. The survey captures the recipients' preferred TA delivery methods by activity categories and TA duration and identifies barriers and facilitators to TA engagement. Two phases were carried out: 1) outlining the survey components and assessing face and content validity, and 2) testing the survey with state tobacco control staff and analyzing the survey responses using descriptive statistics. Twenty-seven tobacco control managers and staff representing 14 U.S. state tobacco control programs participated in testing the survey. The final survey included 21 questions. Virtual meetings were the preferred TA delivery method for three TA activities: 1) professional development, 2) coaching and mentoring, and 3) collaborative work. The preferred duration was 1.4-3.0 h/month. Respondents wanted pragmatic information with actionable steps (92 %) and examples of similar challenges other programs address (89 %) in the TA sessions. Respondents pointed to low organizational capacity (76 %) and competing priorities (76 %) as barriers to TA engagement. The TA survey allows TA providers to identify TA recipients' preferences regarding TA activities and delivery methods, the TA duration, and potential barriers preventing recipients from participating in TA sessions.

Indexed as

Health Planning Technical AssistanceProgram DevelopmentHumansProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ControlUnited StatesBarriers and facilitatorsEvidence-informedProgram implementationSurvey developmentSurvey toolTechnical assistanceTobacco control programs

Identifiers

PMID41579744
PMCPMC13122650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.