Trial reportPregnancy hypertension2026
Preconception vitamin D status and subsequent risk of preeclampsia: A secondary cohort analysis from the EAGeR trial.
Trial report in Pregnancy hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate associations between maternal serum 25-hyroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] measured at both preconception and 8 weeks gestation and the risk of preeclampsia. STUDY
designA secondary analysis of the EAGeR Trial (2006-2012), which was a multisite, prospective, double-blind, block-randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of women with regular menstrual cycles and 1-2 prior pregnancy losses. Analyses were restricted to participants who conceived and had a live birth (N = 552) and serum 25(OH)D measured at preconception and 8 weeks' gestation.
main outcome measuresLog-binomial regression with robust standard errors estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for preeclampsia across 25(OH)D categories. Inverse probability weighting accounted for selection bias from restricting analyses to live births.
resultsOverall, 55 (10.0%) women developed preeclampsia. In adjusted models excluding body mass index (BMI), deficient preconception 25(OH)D levels (≤20 ng/ml) were associated with an increased preeclampsia risk (RR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.09, 4.95) compared with sufficient levels (≥30 ng/ml). These associations were attenuated after adjusting for BMI and other covariates (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.64, 3.29). No significant associations were observed for insufficient 25(OH)D or for concentrations measured at 8 weeks' gestation.
conclusionDeficient preconception 25(OH)D levels may be associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, although this relationship appears partly mediated by BMI. These findings highlight the preconception period as a potentially critical window for optimizing maternal vitamin D status and reducing future preeclampsia risk. Addressing maternal nutritional status before conception may offer a novel prevention strategy warranting confirmation in larger and more diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.