ReviewDigestion2026
<italic>Helicobacter pylori</italic>-Naïve Gastric Neoplasms: Clinicopathological and Molecular Features and Diagnostic Challenges.
Review in Digestion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the increasing proportion of the Helicobacter pylori (Hp)-naïve population in Japan, conventional Hp-infected gastric neoplasms (HpIGNs) have decreased, whereas Hp-naïve gastric neoplasms (HpNGNs) are being detected more frequently. SUMMARY: Hp infection remodels the gastric mucosa and promotes tumorigenesis through a high mutational burden and epigenetic dysregulation, contributing to the histologically diverse and aggressive nature of HpIGNs. In contrast, HpNGNs arise with few genetic and epigenetic alterations, resulting in limited morphological diversity determined by the type of their background mucosa. Most HpNGNs arise in the fundic gland mucosa and exhibit a gastric phenotype, whereas those arising from the pyloric gland mucosa or gastric cardia show a variable phenotype. Regardless of histologic subtype, HpNGNs are generally biologically indolent, except for a subset arising in the gastric cardia. The histological classification of HpNGNs does not always fit conventional diagnostic frameworks for gastric neoplasms. In particular, foveolar-type adenomas (FGAs) need to be subclassified into flat and raspberry types, which represent distinct molecular entities. Furthermore, HpNGNs with a MUC6-dominant gastric phenotype, including gastric adenocarcinomas of fundic gland or fundic gland mucosa type and some flat-type FGAs with partial MUC6-dominant components, and pyloric gland adenomas form a morphological and molecular continuum, occasionally making histological distinction difficult. A comprehensive disease concept integrating these lesions may help resolve this diagnostic issue. KEY MESSAGES: As the prevalence of Hp infection continues to decline worldwide, HpNGNs are expected to emerge as a distinct disease entity, highlighting the need for refined diagnostic frameworks and risk-based surveillance strategies in the post-Hp era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.