ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2026
Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill: mechanisms, modulation, and clinical utility.
Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human locomotion exhibits remarkable adaptability, allowing individuals to dynamically adjust their gait patterns in response to changing environmental demands. Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill has been a widely studied motor learning technique where two independent treadmill belts move at different speeds, generating adaptation of stepping symmetry over time. This review synthesizes current knowledge on how distinct neural substrates modulate gait in response to the split-belt treadmill through reactive and adaptive processes, highlighting the cerebellum's role in forward model recalibration driven by sensory prediction errors. Particular emphasis is placed on integrating findings across all investigated modulators of locomotor adaptation, including error size, sensory environment, visual feedback, neuromodulation, and cognitive demands, examining both well-established effects on adaptation dynamics and areas where knowledge remains limited. Despite considerable research on the locomotor adaptation paradigm with robust effects on the treadmill, the limited transfer of locomotor adaptation to overground walking remains a major clinical barrier, likely due to the sensory differences between walking contexts. Recent evidence supporting a credit assignment framework is discussed, which suggests that the nervous system attributes motor errors to either shared or context-specific forward models, influencing generalization. Understanding and manipulating this mechanism, with a focus on the sensory environment during adaptation, may be essential to improving the clinical utility of locomotor adaptation and enhancing neurorehabilitation strategies aimed at restoring symmetrical walking in neurological populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.