Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41579254›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Conceptualising and mapping polarisation trends in land systems.

Christian Levers, Julian Helfenstein, Matthias Bürgi, Niels Debonne, Vasco Diogo, Rebekka Dossche, Felix Herzog, Yafei Li, Franziska Mohr, Rebecca Swart and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christian LeversDepartment of Environmental Geography, Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. christian.levers@thuenen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4810-9024
Julian HelfensteinAgricultural Landscapes and Biodiversity, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-2589
Matthias BürgiLand Change Science Research Unit, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-601X
Niels DebonneDepartment of Environmental Geography, Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3755-3226
Vasco DiogoAgricultural Landscapes and Biodiversity, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5732-9390
Rebekka DosscheLand Change Science Research Unit, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8437-3853
Felix HerzogAgricultural Landscapes and Biodiversity, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9472-4891
Yafei LiAgricultural Landscapes and Biodiversity, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-2655
Franziska MohrLand Change Science Research Unit, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8323-7032
Rebecca SwartDepartment of Environmental Geography, Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2855-3363
Tim G WilliamsDepartment of Environmental Geography, Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5642-728X
Peter H VerburgDepartment of Environmental Geography, Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-7104

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSII5_183493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polarisation is a key process in land systems, describing land-change trajectories within a region that simultaneously move in opposite directions, such as co-occurring agricultural intensification and abandonment. Land-system polarisation relates strongly to sustainability goals, with potentially positive or negative consequences depending on domain and context. Yet, we lack approaches for mapping polarisation, limiting our understanding of its spatiotemporal distribution and integration into policy or impact assessments. We address this gap by exploring the concept of land-system polarisation and identifying five key dimensions for its mapping: spatial scales, temporal scales, land-use sectors, indicators, and neighbourhood relationships. We propose and test a workflow using the EU's crop production systems, showing that ~ 87% of NUTS2 regions display polarisation. Our transferable workflow is adaptable across scales and contexts, enabling polarisation to serve as a lens for examining land-change drivers and impacts and providing spatially explicit information to guide targeted intervention and monitoring efforts.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringCrops, AgriculturalIndicatorsLandscapesLand-use changeMulti-scalePathwaysSocial–ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID41579254
PMCPMC13230460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.