ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Assisted living resident quality of life questionnaire: development and validation.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs an increasing number of older adults in the U.S. seek out assisted living services, there is a continued need to comprehensively assess quality within assisted living facilities to ensure consumers are well-informed when deciding where to seek care, and to assist quality improvement efforts within facilities. The current study aimed to develop, test, and validate a questionnaire to holistically measure quality of life among assisted living residents, which is one metric for quality in assisted living. METHODOLOGY: The questionnaire development, testing, and validation process included three phases. First, informed by existing literature, an item bank was created and then refined based on stakeholder feedback and cognitive interviews with assisted living residents. Second, targeted pilot testing was completed via mailed questionnaires and in-person cognitive interviews with assisted living residents in memory care units. Third, pilot testing across Minnesota, via in-person, phone, and mail administration, was conducted to test the reliability and validity of the measure.
resultsFactor analysis results revealed five subscales: The People Who Work Here; Food; Security, Safety & Privacy; Choice/Autonomy; Religion/Spirituality. Two additional sub-domains were identified: Activities and Finances. All sub-scales indicated adequate to high internal consistency and were positively correlated with other indicators of resident satisfaction in expected ways. Measurement equivalence across administration modes (mail, phone, in-person) suggests inter-changeability.
conclusionsThe questionnaire developed and tested in this study to measure resident quality of life in assisted living facilities is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in large-scale measurement efforts to capture one aspect of quality at the facility level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.