Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2026
Molecular background behind lateral elbow pain reduction with Leukocyte-Rich and Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma-randomized control trial and single-cell platelet analysis.
Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06854666 (Clinical and Morphological Evaluation Following Treatment of Lateral Epicondylar Tendinopathy with PRP or L-PRP,saline- Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Morphological Evaluation Following Treatment of Lateral Epicondylar Tendinopathy with PRP or L-PRP,saline- Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDegeneration at the common extensor origin leads to lateral elbow pain and reduced quality of life. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 71 patients treated with leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP), or saline.
methodsPRP content was analyzed using flow cytometry, confocal microscopy, and holotomography. Clinical outcomes (Visual Analogue Scale, Oxford Elbow Score) were assessed at baseline and at three, six, 12, 24, and 55 weeks.
resultsLR-PRP contained 3.8 × more leukocytes and 2.7 × fewer platelets than LP-PRP. Imaging revealed distinct platelet morphology and activation patterns between PRP types. The LP-PRP group showed significantly greater pain reduction at six weeks and improved elbow function from three to six weeks onward.
conclusionLP-PRP produced superior and longer-lasting clinical outcomes compared to LR-PRP and saline. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT06854666 (retrospectively registered on 2025-01-13).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41579194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.