ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Trends and Insights in Urethral Diverticula Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisUrethral diverticulum (UD) is a complex condition with significant implications for patient quality of life. Despite increasing interest, gaps remain in understanding its etiology, optimal diagnosis, and long-term outcomes. This bibliometric analysis examines global research trends in UD to identify key themes and knowledge gaps.
methodsA literature search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection on January 8, 2025, using the terms "urethral diverticulum" OR "urethral diverticula" OR ("urethra" AND "diverticulum"). English-language original and review articles published between 1970 and 2024 were included. Articles were manually screened for relevance. Bibliometric analysis was performed using Bibliometrix and VOSviewer to assess publication trends, citation impact, collaboration networks, and keyword co-occurrence.
resultsA total of 357 articles met inclusion criteria, with a slow annual publication growth rate (0.95%). The United States, China, and the United Kingdom were the top contributors, with low international co-authorship rates (5.6%). Most research focused on surgical management, especially diverticulectomy, with limited studies on conservative treatments or minimally invasive approaches. Key research themes included imaging techniques, surgical outcomes, and UD management in women, while gaps persisted in long-term patient-reported outcomes and standardized diagnostic protocols.
conclusionsUD research remains underdeveloped with a predominance of surgical studies. Increased international collaboration and research on nonsurgical management, minimally invasive techniques, and long-term outcomes are needed to refine clinical guidelines and improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41579193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.