ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Electromyographic activity during bench press differs by attentional focus strategy and sport: a cross-sectional comparison of bodybuilding, powerlifting, and paralympic powerlifting.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo provide new insights into the regulation of muscle activation by attentional focus strategies by examining whether differences in attentional focus among athletes who use the bench press (BP) as part of their training are reflected in distinct acute electromyography (EMG) responses during BP.
methodsThirty-seven participants were included: ten bodybuilding (BB) athletes, ten powerlifting (PL) athletes, seven paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes, and ten untrained controls (CON). BP tests were performed under four conditions: external focus, pectoralis internal focus (IF), triceps IF, and a no-instruction baseline. Under each condition, the participants completed three repetitions at 60% and 80% of the One-repetition maximum (1RM). The surface EMG of the pectoralis major and lateral and long heads of the triceps brachii were recorded and normalized to the maximum voluntary contraction.
resultsAt 60% 1RM, selective activation of the pectoralis major during BP was observed only in the BB group (p < 0.01) and not in the PL, PP, or CON groups. Across conditions, the long-head EMG of the triceps in the PP group was consistently higher than that in the other groups under every condition (p < 0.05, p < 0.01), whereas no significant between-group differences were observed for the pectoralis or triceps lateral-head EMG.
conclusionThe findings indicate that even among athletes proficient in the same BP exercise, attentional focus influences EMG amplitude depending on the combination of sport-specific characteristics and load intensity. These differences suggest the presence of sports-specific and intensity-dependent differences in the neural control of force production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41579184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.