Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41579177›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026

Cognitive reappraisal training as an intervention in patients with functional movement disorders: a placebo-controlled EEG pilot study.

Melanie Suette, Petra Schwingenschuh, Daniela Kern, Birgit Ludwig, Lukas Gattermeyer-Kell, Mariella Kögl, Maria Zangl, Corinna M Perchtold-Stefan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melanie SuetteDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036 , Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9658-618X
Petra SchwingenschuhDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036 , Graz, Austria. petra.schwingenschuh@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3294-6824
Daniela KernDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036 , Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5151-5324
Birgit LudwigDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5119-8665
Lukas Gattermeyer-KellDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036 , Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9699-2959
Mariella KöglDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036 , Graz, Austria.
Maria ZanglDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036 , Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8388-5518
Corinna M Perchtold-StefanDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-0574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional movement disorders (FMD) are common and disabling neurological conditions characterized by impaired voluntary motor control in the absence of structural disease. Accumulating evidence suggests that emotion regulation deficits contribute to the pathophysiology of FMD. This randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study investigated the clinical and neural effects of a digital cognitive reappraisal training program in patients with FMD, targeting emotion regulation as a potential therapeutic mechanism. Twenty adult patients diagnosed with clinically definite FMD (mean age = 50.7 years, 11 females) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention group practicing cognitive reappraisal (n = 11) or an active control group completing reflection exercises (n = 9). Both groups underwent 14 brief, app-based training sessions over four weeks. Clinical outcomes were assessed before and after the intervention using standardized measures of mood, motor function, and overall illness severity. Simultaneously, brain activity at rest and during a standardized reappraisal task was recorded via electroencephalography, focusing on prefrontal alpha asymmetry as a neural marker of reappraisal engagement. Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in mood (Mdiff = 0.542, p = .010), motor function (Mdiff = 0.542, p = .033), and overall illness severity (Mdiff = 0.528, p = .040). Both groups improved over time in mood (p = .030), tremor severity (p = .014), and subjectively rated motor function (p = .022), suggesting non-specific benefits of structured emotional self-reflection. Crucially, electroencephalography data revealed a significant post-training increase in right-lateralized frontopolar resting-state activity in the intervention group (Mdiff = 13.29, p = .026), aligning with prior evidence linking right prefrontal activity to successful reappraisal. Although task-related EEG activity did not differ significantly between groups, a statistical trend (p = .115, d = 1.14) suggests increased right frontal activity during reappraisal generation in the intervention group. Reappraisal training performance correlated with EEG changes and with the frequent use of the distancing strategy "relativizing," implicating right prefrontal involvement in specific cognitive control processes. These findings provide preliminary evidence that cognitive reappraisal training delivered via mobile app is feasible and may enhance both clinical outcomes and prefrontal brain function in FMD. Future studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these effects and better understand the neural mechanisms of digital interventions for emotion regulation in functional neurological disorders.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.