ArticleNeuroradiology2026
The diagnostic value of cortical high-flow sign combined with cystathionine on
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Imaging diagnosis of adult-type diffuse gliomas in the era of WHO CNS5 and cIMPACT-NOW updates 8-11: a narrative review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo leverage a combination of cortical high-flow sign on arterial spin labeling (ASL) and cystathionine measurement using MATERIALS AND
methodsWe implemented pseudo-continuous ASL technique (post-labeling delay = 2000 ms) using a 3.0-T MRI scanner. Relative perfusion maps were generated by subtracting paired labeled images from control images.
resultsThe cortical high-flow sign was identified more frequent in O_IDHm-codel (7/12, 58.3%) than in A_IDHm-noncodel (3/18, 16.7%; p = 0.018). The cystathionine levels in O_IDHm-codel (1.50 ± 0.63 mM) was significantly higher than in A_IDHm-noncodel (0.85 ± 0.24 mM; p = 0.001). The area under the curve for distinguishing O_IDHm-codel from A_IDHm-noncodel using the presence of cortical high-flow sign, cystathionine levels, and their combination was 0.708 (0.509-0.908), 0.750 (0.553-0.947), and 0.875 (0.737-1.000), respectively.
conclusionThe presence of cortical high-flow sign on ASL, along with elevated cystathionine levels measured by 1H-MRS, could differentiate O_IDHm-codel from A_IDHm-noncodel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41579156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.