Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41579105›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2026

Automatic Selection of Search Parameter Values for Mass Spectrometry-Based Search Engines.

Yehia M Farag, Henrik Ø Søgaard, Harald Barsnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yehia M FaragProteomics Unit, Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen 5020, Norway.
Henrik Ø SøgaardProteomics Unit, Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen 5020, Norway.
Harald BarsnesProteomics Unit, Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen 5020, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9696-2148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial step in processing mass spectrometry-based proteomics data is identifying and quantifying the proteins in the sample. While the existing search engines can easily match tandem mass spectra to peptide sequences, selecting the most appropriate search parameters can often be challenging and time-consuming due to the diversity of the data sets and the long list of available parameter values to choose from. This study introduces QuickSearchProt─an algorithm aimed at assisting in the selection of search parameter values across search engines, considering not only the data set specifications but also the properties of the search algorithms. By relying on a small representative subset of the spectra, the algorithm can process most data sets within minutes, largely independent of the size of the original data set. The current implementation supports two common search engines, X! Tandem and Sage, and is designed to process data-dependent acquisition (DDA) proteomics data sets but due to its adaptability and scalability can easily be extended to additional search engines. QuickSearchProt, including a graphical user interface, the complete source code, and additional details are freely available at http://www.github.com/barsnes-group/QuickSearchProt.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryProteomicsSearch EngineSoftwareAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinTandem Mass Spectrometryautoselectiondata processingmass spectrometryprotein identificationproteomicssearch enginessearch parameters

Identifiers

PMID41579105
PMCPMC12887993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.