Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41579045›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2026

Psychosocial Factors Are Rarely the Focus of Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture: A Short Report of Routinely Collected Health Data.

Nicholas F Taylor, Made U Rimayanti, Nora Shields, Casey L Peiris, Paul D O'Halloran, Elizabeth Wintle, Katherine E Harding, Scott Williams, Adam I Semciw, April Simpson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Psychosocial Factors Are Rarely the Focus of Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture: A Short Report of Routinely Collected Health Data.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicholas F TaylorLa Trobe University and Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9474-2504
Made U RimayantiLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nora ShieldsOlga Tennison Autism Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Casey L PeirisLa Trobe University and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul D O'HalloranLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Elizabeth WintleEastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Katherine E HardingLa Trobe University and Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Scott WilliamsLa Trobe University and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Adam I SemciwLa Trobe University and Northern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
April SimpsonEastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
David A SnowdonLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

La Trobe University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeHip fracture is a serious and common injury affecting older adults with significant psychosocial impacts. However, there is little information available on the assessment and treatment of psychosocial impacts of hip fracture during rehabilitation. Our aim was to determine the extent to which psychosocial factors are: (1) incorporated into goal setting; and (2) assessment and treatment during rehabilitation after hip fracture.

methodsA retrospective data audit of patients admitted to a community rehabilitation program with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture from 30 June 2022 to 30 June 2023 in Melbourne, Australia. Data were extracted from the assessment and treatment notes of physiotherapists and occupational therapists.

resultsOne-hundred included patients (59% female, mean age 81 (SD 7) years) were admitted to the community rehabilitation program an average of 41 days (SD 29) after hip fracture. All patients consulted a physiotherapist, 23 an occupational therapist, 6 a dietitian and 3 a social worker. Overall, 3 of 100 patients had a goal that focused on psychosocial functioning and 21 had a goal with a psychosocial element. A total of 96 patients had a mental health screening, but of 17 who were assessed as being 'at risk', 9 (53%) patients did not receive any documented psychosocial management, including 5 (29%) who declined referrals for mental health services. Apart from those patients screened as 'at risk' a number of patients with clinical notes indicating psychosocial concerns were recorded as receiving education (n = 16) and encouragement (n = 9). DISCUSSION: Psychosocial aspects of goals, assessment and treatment are rarely the focus of management in rehabilitation after hip fracture. More attention is needed to assess and treat psychosocial factors as part of a multidisciplinary, holistic approach to rehabilitation after hip fracture.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleProximal Femoral FracturesRetrospective Studiesclinical audithip fracturesmultidisciplinary care teamrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41579045
PMCPMC12831500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.