ArticleAge and ageing2026
The World Health Organization ageism towards older persons scale: preliminary validation of a novel measure of ageist stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination in four different countries.
Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents the preliminary validation of the WHO Ageism Towards Older Persons Scale (WHO-A-TOPS), a new measure designed to comprehensively assess ageism, whilst capturing its three dimensions (e.g. stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination based on age). The study evaluated the structural validity, measurement invariance, internal consistency, and construct validity of the WHO-A-TOPS. Data were collected from four countries: Czech Republic, Germany, Israel, and the United Kingdom, with a total sample of 1778 participants aged 20-90 years. Through an iterative process, a 10-item one-factor model was identified, demonstrating acceptable partial scalar measurement invariance across the four countries and invariance across different age groups. Hence, indicating that the new measure can capture a common construct across the four investigated countries and the three age groups. The final 10-item scale captures all three dimensions of ageism: stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination. The new tool represents an exceptional attempt to develop a measure of high psychometric properties following current state-of-the-art guidelines. The tool can be used across different countries and age groups. The study discusses the implications of these findings for ageism research and practise, highlighting the importance of cross-country validation and the complexities of measuring ageism's multifaceted nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.