ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026
Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training Enhances Brachial Blood Flow During Exercise but not Reactive Hyperemia in Experienced Climbers.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training Enhances Brachial Blood Flow During Exercise but not Reactive Hyperemia in Experienced Climbers.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
- Forearm blood flow and vascular conductance improve after 18 weeks of bouldering training in novice climbers.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Interaction of sublingual glyceryl tri-nitrate administration on single muscle contraction-induced hyperemia: potential insight into the role of the skeletal muscle pump.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-load blood flow restriction training (LLBFRT) induces significant vascular stress, which is often associated with vascular remodeling, increased capillarization and muscle blood flow. These adaptations may be of interest to climbers as their endurance performance is limited by blood supply due to the isometric and intermittent nature of finger flexors (FD) contraction. This study, thus, aimed to assess vascular adaptations to a 5-week FD protocol using LLBFRT (n = 12, cuff pressure = 60% of the limb occlusion pressure) and compare these responses to those elicited by high-load resistance training (HLRT, n = 12) and no specific training (CON, n = 12) in male climbers. Participants in LLBFRT and HLRT trained twice a week, respectively at ~40% and ~75% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Before and after the intervention, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), peak reactive hyperemia blood flow, brachial blood flow and muscle oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy) at rest and during contractions from 10% to 60% MVC were assessed using brachial doppler-ultrasound. Brachial blood flow across contraction intensities was significantly improved in LLBFRT (+19% ± 31%; p = 0.011, d = 0.5) but not in CON and HLRT. Oxy- and total hemoglobin concentrations decreased less during contraction following LLBFRT while did not change following CON and HLRT. Reactive hyperemia and FMD were not altered by any training modality. In conclusion, despite no difference with HLRT, LLBFRT was the only protocol which increased significantly blood flow of the feeding artery and O
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.