Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578978›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Educational inequalities in cervical cancer mortality in the Baltic countries and Finland in the context of organized screening: A register-based study 2000-2015.

Oskar Nõmm, Kaire Innos, Domantas Jasilionis, Juris Krumins, Pekka Martikainen, Kersti Pärna, Andrew Stickley, Mall Leinsalu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oskar NõmmDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0410-7783
Kaire InnosDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0120-2213
Domantas JasilionisLaboratory of Demographic Data, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
Juris KruminsDemography Unit, Faculty of Business, Management and Economics, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Pekka MartikainenHelsinki Institute for Demography and Population Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Kersti PärnaInstitute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Andrew StickleyStockholm Centre for Health and Social Change, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden.
Mall LeinsaluDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-4760

Funding

Cities of Helsinki, Vantaa and Espoo 4706914Eesti Teadusagentuur PRG2543Eesti Teadusagentuur PRG722H2020 European Research Council 101019329Helsingin Yliopisto #77204227Latvian Council of Science; Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö 210046Max Planck Society #5714240218Research Council of Finland 52543-352572 (ACELife) and 345219 (LIFECON)Riksbankens Jubileumsfond P15-0520:1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) mortality in the Baltic countries remains high. We explored CC mortality trends and educational inequalities in CC mortality in the Baltics in the context of organized CC screening (introduced in 2004 in Lithuania, 2006 in Estonia and 2009 in Latvia) and compared the results with Finland (where screening started in 1963). Data for the Baltic countries came from longitudinal mortality follow-up studies of population censuses in 2000/2001 and 2011, and data for Finland from the longitudinal register-based population data file of Statistics Finland. CC deaths (ICD-10 code C53) were linked from national mortality registries. Information on education was census- or register-based. Overall and education-specific age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) and mortality rate ratios were calculated for 2000-2007 and 2008-2015 for women aged 30-49 and 50-64 years. The Baltic countries had 5-9 times higher overall ASMRs than Finland and much larger inequalities in CC mortality between low- and highly educated women. From 2000-2007 to 2008-2015 absolute inequalities in younger women reduced in all countries, except Latvia and relative inequalities increased in Estonia and Latvia. In older women, absolute inequalities increased in the Baltics but not in Finland; relative inequalities increased in all countries. The reduction in CC mortality and in absolute inequalities in younger women in Estonia and Lithuania may be associated with the introduction of organized screening. However, increasing CC mortality among older low-educated women in the Baltic countries is alarming, indicating that they have not benefitted equally from CC prevention.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultBaltic StatesEarly Detection of CancerEducational StatusFemaleFinlandHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRegistriesSocioeconomic Disparities in Healthcervical cancereducationinequalitiesmortalityscreening

Identifiers

PMID41578978
PMCPMC13106923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.