Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578943›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology letters2026

Oral examination as a tool for mastery learning in undergraduate microbiology.

Andrew R St James, Camille Widener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew R St JamesDepartment of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5607-2789
Camille WidenerDepartment of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undergraduate courses in general microbiology often have high content and cognitive loads, making it challenging for students to achieve content mastery of the whole curriculum. Thus, the development of manageable mastery learning interventions that work within these contexts should benefit microbiology education broadly. In this work, we describe an oral examination intervention implemented within a modified Bloom's Learning for Mastery framework that significantly improves retention of course material across low-performing students in an undergraduate general microbiology course. The intervention consumed a relatively small amount of instructor time to administer (less than 15 min per student) and resulted in no distinguishable differences in knowledge retention on the final exam between students who initially mastered the content and did not participate in the intervention and those who participated in the intervention after failing to initially master the content. Students reported overwhelmingly positive experiences with the intervention, including increased perceptions of their own content retention, increased feelings of self-pride after participating in the intervention, and a general feeling that the intervention was fair. We conclude that oral examinations are an effective mastery learning tool in the microbiology classroom and can be easily implemented by the instructor alone in small- to medium-sized courses.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementLearningMicrobiologyCurriculumHumansStudentsassessment techniquesmastery learningmicrobiology educationoral examinationundergraduate educationviva voce

Identifiers

PMID41578943
PMCPMC13130396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.