Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578848›Full record

ReviewPlant & cell physiology2026

Progress and prospects of parasitic plant biodiversity genomics.

Woorin Kim, Matthias Jost, Daniel Nickrent, Renchao Zhou, Pelin Acar, Felix Langschied, Ingo Ebersberger, Susann Wicke, Stefan Wanke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant & cell physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Woorin KimDepartment of Botany and Molecular Evolution, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt am Main 60325, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-5091-0087
Matthias JostDepartment of Botany and Molecular Evolution, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt am Main 60325, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2339-3241
Daniel NickrentCollege of Agriculture and Life Science, School of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Biology Section, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8519-0517
Renchao ZhouSchool of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-8583
Pelin AcarDepartment of Botany and Molecular Evolution, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt am Main 60325, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8383-9431
Felix LangschiedApplied Bioinformatics Group, Institute of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-3348-3130
Ingo EbersbergerApplied Bioinformatics Group, Institute of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8187-9253
Susann WickeInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Schlosspl. 2, Münster 48149, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-9500
Stefan WankeDepartment of Botany and Molecular Evolution, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt am Main 60325, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5405-5216

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TRR175/A08Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WI4507/3-1German Academic Exchange Service
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitic plants have evolved independently at least a dozen times across angiosperms, yielding some of the most extreme examples of genomic reconfiguration in plants. Comparative analyses of plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear genomes reveal striking convergence across lineages such as progressive plastid genome reduction with retention of a minimal core gene set, alongside lineage-specific divergences, including unusual mitochondrial genome architectures, rampant horizontal gene transfer, and repeated loss of nuclear gene families. Expanded sampling largely confirms stepwise plastid genome condensation but also uncovers rare losses of presumed essential genes, novel tRNA retention patterns, and extremes in genome size and base composition. Mitochondrial genome sizes largely vary (<60 kb to ~4 Mb), shaped by repeat proliferation, recombination, and massive acquisition of foreign DNA. Nuclear genomes integrate these organellar changes with structural and regulatory innovations via e.g. polyploidy and repeat-driven evolution, as well as large-scale gene losses. These insights are increasingly translatable to agriculture through predictive weed management and resistance breeding pipelines that combine preattachment control, postattachment defense, and molecular surveillance to slow virulence evolution. The same genomic toolkits, including high-quality assemblies, organelle haplotyping, and quantitative diagnostics, can support the conservation of nonweedy parasites by refining species boundaries, identifying evolutionarily significant units, and informing International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List assessments and recovery plans. By bridging fundamental and applied research, parasitic plant genomics is poised to move beyond descriptive cataloguing toward design-based strategies that safeguard crop production while conserving some of the most specialized and ecologically vulnerable plants on earth.

Indexed as

BiodiversityGenome, PlantGenomicsPlantsEvolution, MolecularGenome, MitochondrialGenome, Plastidbiodiversityconservation genomicsmitochondrial genomemolecular diagnosticsnuclear genomeplastomeweed management

Identifiers

PMID41578848
PMCPMC13192426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.