ReviewPlant & cell physiology2026
Progress and prospects of parasitic plant biodiversity genomics.
Review in Plant & cell physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parasitic plants have evolved independently at least a dozen times across angiosperms, yielding some of the most extreme examples of genomic reconfiguration in plants. Comparative analyses of plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear genomes reveal striking convergence across lineages such as progressive plastid genome reduction with retention of a minimal core gene set, alongside lineage-specific divergences, including unusual mitochondrial genome architectures, rampant horizontal gene transfer, and repeated loss of nuclear gene families. Expanded sampling largely confirms stepwise plastid genome condensation but also uncovers rare losses of presumed essential genes, novel tRNA retention patterns, and extremes in genome size and base composition. Mitochondrial genome sizes largely vary (<60 kb to ~4 Mb), shaped by repeat proliferation, recombination, and massive acquisition of foreign DNA. Nuclear genomes integrate these organellar changes with structural and regulatory innovations via e.g. polyploidy and repeat-driven evolution, as well as large-scale gene losses. These insights are increasingly translatable to agriculture through predictive weed management and resistance breeding pipelines that combine preattachment control, postattachment defense, and molecular surveillance to slow virulence evolution. The same genomic toolkits, including high-quality assemblies, organelle haplotyping, and quantitative diagnostics, can support the conservation of nonweedy parasites by refining species boundaries, identifying evolutionarily significant units, and informing International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List assessments and recovery plans. By bridging fundamental and applied research, parasitic plant genomics is poised to move beyond descriptive cataloguing toward design-based strategies that safeguard crop production while conserving some of the most specialized and ecologically vulnerable plants on earth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.