ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2025
Cemented versus cementless hemiarthroplasty in end-stage chronic kidney disease: A retrospective comparative study of femoral neck fracture outcomes.
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the functional outcomes and complications of cemented versus cementless femoral stem fixation in end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with traumatic femoral neck fractures (FNF).
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 43 hips of 42 patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease (mean age 77.7 years; range, 55-89; 42.9% female) who underwent hemiarthroplasty for traumatic femoral neck fractures at a regional trauma center between 2010 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to the fixation method: cemented hemiarthroplasty (n = 23) and cement less hemiarthroplasty (n = 20). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and complications including throm boembolic events, surgical site infection, periprosthetic fracture, prosthesis dislocation, osteolysis, reoperation, and mortality were evaluated.
resultsThe mean follow-up duration was 45.1 months. At final follow-up, the mean HHS was significantly higher in the cementless group compared with the cemented group (72.1 vs. 68.3, P = .011). Osteolysis occurred more frequently in the cemented group (30.4% vs. 0%, P = .008). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding thromboembolic events (0% vs. 5.0%, P = .284), surgical site infection (4.3% vs. 10.0%, P = .473), periprosthetic fracture (4.3% vs. 0%, P = .351), prosthesis dislocation (8.7% vs. 5.0%, P = .639), reoperation rates (13.0% vs. 15.0%, P = .855), or overall mortality (69.6% vs. 60.0%, P = .517).
conclusionIn end-stage CKD patients with traumatic FNFs, cementless hemiarthroplasty was associated with fewer cases of osteolysis and better functional outcomes compared with cemented fixation. These findings highlight the potential biomechanical advantage of cementless fixation in prolonging prosthesis survival and support its consideration as the preferred option in patients with end-stage CKD. Cite this article as: Abul MS, Yılmaz H, Sevim ÖF, Hekim Ö, Kayaalp ME, Eceviz E. Cemented versus cementless hemiarthroplasty in end-stage chronic kidney disease: A retrospective comparative study of femoral neck fracture outcomes. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2025;59(6):458-462.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.