ArticleThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2025
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Nutritional Risk Score-2002 and Royal Free Hospital-Nutritional Prioritizing Tool Nutrition Screening Tools in Liver Cirrhosis.
Article in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsMalnutrition is a serious problem in patients with liver cirrhosis; therefore, it is recommended that nutritional screening should be performed regularly with appropriate nutritional screening tools (NSTs). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the Nutritional Risk Score-2002 (NRS-2002) and Royal Free Hospital-Nutritional Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT) NSTs in detecting malnutrition in liver cirrhosis patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted with cirrhotic patients (n = 149). The NRS-2002 and RFH-NPT scales were used to assess the nutritional status of patients, and anthropometric measurements were taken. Biochemical findings of patients were recorded. The Chronic Liver Disease Life Quality Scale 2.0 (CLDLQS 2.0) was used to determine the quality of life.
resultsAccording to both NSTs, patients with nutritional risk had lower body weight, body mass index, albumin levels, higher C-reactive protein levels, and quality of life scores than patients without nutritional risk (P < .05). The sensitivity and specificity of the RFH-NPT were 91.5% and 63.3%, respectively. Albumin was more effective in predicting nutritional risk than other biochemical parameters. The RFH-NPT was found to be more correlated with biochemical parameters than NRS-2002.
conclusionThe RFH-NPT is highly effective in detecting malnutrition and correlates with biochemical parameters in cirrhotic patients. Cite this article as: Calapkorur S, Canaydin AO, Sezgin GC, Sahin H. Comparison of the effectiveness of Nutritional Risk Score-2002 and Royal Free Hospital-Nutritional Prioritizing Tool nutrition screening tools in liver cirrhosis. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2026;37(1):121-126.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41578801PMC12824885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.