ReviewActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2025
Application of patient-specific surgical guides in foot and ankle surgery.
Review in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Clinical application research of three-dimensional printed patient-specific cutting guides in Cole midfoot osteotomy].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional printing has rapidly evolved into an important technology in orthopedic surgery, enabling the creation of patient-spe cific instruments, implants, and anatomical models. As printing has become more affordable and accessible, point-of-care manufacturing has increasingly allowed clinicians to design and produce surgical aids directly within clinical units. This development, combined with advances in computed tomography (CT)-based imaging and segmentation software, has significantly expanded the use of patient-specific surgical guides (PSGs), particularly in foot and ankle surgery, where complex multiplanar deformities, poor soft-tissue, and limited visu alization often create technical challenges. Patient-specific surgical guides are generated from thin-slice CT data and allow surgeons to accurately transfer preoperative planning to the operative field. Their use has been reported across a wide range of procedures, including deformity correction, joint fusion, ankle arthroplasty, etc. Across these applications, studies consistently demonstrate improved osteot omy accuracy, enhanced deformity correction, reduced operative time, lower fluoroscopy exposure, and greater reproducibility between surgeons. The increasing adoption of weight-bearing CT has further strengthened the accuracy of preoperative planning by capturing true functional alignment. Despite these advantages, several limitations persist, including increased preoperative imaging requirements, higher initial costs, and dependency on manufacturing logistics. Most published studies remain level III-IV, with limited long-term data on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless, as technological capabilities improve and workflows become more efficient, PSGs are poised to become an integral component of personalized foot and ankle surgery, with the potential to enhance both surgical precision and patient outcomes. Cite this article as: Kavak S, Ozturk B, Ogut T, DiGiovanni CW, Esfahani SA, Karaismailoglu B. Application of patient-specific surgical guides in foot and ankle surgery. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2025;59(6):340-348.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.