ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2025
Retrospective clinicopathological analysis of 193 cases of bone and soft tissue tumors in the foot and ankle.
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological features, anatomical distribution, and treatment methods of bone and soft tissue tumors in the foot and ankle region.
methodsThis retrospective study included 193 cases evaluated at the musculoskeletal tumor board of the institution between January 2014 and December 2024. Patients' demographic data (84 males, 109 females; mean age, 37.8 years), lesion type, anatomical location, histopathological subtype, and treatment modalities were recorded. Tumors were classified according to the 2020 World Health Organization classification of bone and soft tissue tumors.
resultsOf the 193 cases, 128 (66.3%) were true tumors and 65 (33.7%) were tumor-like lesions. Among the tumors, 70 (54.7%) were bone tumors, 54 (42.2%) were soft tissue tumors, and 4 (3.1%) were metastases. Benign lesions accounted for 79.7%, malignant for 14.0%, and intermediate for 6.3% of all tumors. Tumors were most frequently located in the forefoot (44%), followed by the ankle (29%). Intraosseous lipoma was the most common benign bone tumor, giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath the most common benign soft tissue tumor, and ganglion cyst the most frequent tumor-like lesion. Excisional biopsy was the main treatment, whereas amputation was mainly performed for malignant tumors.
conclusionFoot and ankle tumors are rare but clinically significant as misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can lead to poor outcomes. Although most are benign, malignant cases, especially in the ankle region, require aggressive management. Awareness of their regional distribution and histopathological spectrum is essential for early recognition, accurate diagnosis, and appropriate treatment planning. Cite this article as: Yıldırım S, Çiftdemir M, Salih O, Ustabaşıoğlu FE, Üstün F, Usta U. Retrospective clinicopathological analysis of 193 cases of bone and soft tissue tumors in the foot and ankle. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2025;59(6):485-492.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.