ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
Wind-driven seed dispersal differentially promotes seed trapping and retention across alpine plants.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
premiseSeed dispersal can mediate species interactions between plants across life stages. Plants can physically stop seed movement (seed trapping) and prevent further dispersal following entrapment (seed retention). We therefore hypothesized seed trapping and retention rates depend on the physical attributes of interacting seeds and plants, including seed traits and plant length.
methodsFor combinations of co-occurring plant species in an alpine community, we experimentally measured seed trapping and retention potential. To measure seed trapping, we determined the rate at which seeds were unable to physically pass through vegetation without stopping after being launched at plants. To assess seed retention, we compared the rate that seeds left vegetation following entrapment across plant and seed species and by seed traits.
resultsSeed trapping rates were higher for larger-sized plants and differed among plant species but not seed species. Seed trapping and retention rates were higher for plant species with denser vegetation. Seeds with a pappus were retained less than seeds without, and we observed interactive effects between plant and seed species identity on retention rates.
conclusionsSeed trapping and retention rates are influenced by species identities and the physical attributes of plants and seeds. Because both processes can contribute to where a seed is ultimately dispersed, seed trapping and retention may mediate species co-occurrence and further species interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.