ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2026
Between resistance and adaptation in COVID-19 times: The outbreak daily prevalence moderates the association between conspiracy thinking and adherence to government protocols.
Article in British journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Between resistance and adaptation in COVID-19 times: The outbreak daily prevalence moderates the association between conspiracy thinking and adherence to government protocols.British journal of health psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesConspiracy thinking has played a significant role in shaping public responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and has influenced citizens' adherence to government protocols, including reluctance to receive vaccination and adherence to public health measures. However, little attention has been paid to how contextual factors, such as the severity of the pandemic, interact with these beliefs. This study examines how the prevalence of the pandemic, defined as the ratio between the number of cases and swabs each day, moderated the relationship between conspiracy thinking and adherence to public health norms.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the ResPOnsE COVID-19 project, a rolling cross-section two-wave survey of Italian adults (N = 5421) conducted between March and December 2021. Using a multilevel modelling approach, with data nested by day of data collection, we analysed the association between conspiracy beliefs, reluctance to receive a COVID-19 vaccination and resistance to restrict personal freedoms, interacting conspiracy beliefs with daily variations in pandemic prevalence.
resultsConspiracy beliefs were positively associated with reluctance to receive the COVID-19 vaccination and resistance to restrictions. The prevalence of the pandemic moderated these relationships: As the pandemic prevalence increased, conspiracy believers became more reluctant to get vaccinated but more accepting of restrictions on freedom.
conclusionsOur results emphasize the context-dependent nature of the consequences of conspiracy beliefs. Rather than uniformly rejecting all public health measures, conspiracist citizens adjust their responses depending on contextual factors. These findings challenge simplistic representations of their attitudes and emphasize the need for dynamic public health communication strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.