ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026
Impact of the Buccal Dehiscence Morphotype on the Regenerative Strategy in Immediate Implant Placement.
Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo propose buccal dehiscence morphotypes and discuss their impact on the regenerative potential and strategy in immediate implant placement (IIP). CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Eleven buccal dehiscence morphotypes could be identified based on vertical and lateral extent, and facial soft tissue support. Two morphotypes should not be treated with IIP given a high risk of esthetic failure. These include a buccal dehiscence combined with facial recession and extended defects. Nine morphotypes may be amenable to IIP and appropriate regenerative strategy. Sockets with a relatively high regenerative potential can be treated by slightly modifying the trimodal approach for intact sockets. Sockets with a moderate regenerative potential require the additional use of a non-supportive barrier, whereas those with a low regenerative potential require a supportive barrier and composite bone graft. Comprehensive diagnosis, expertise, and surgical skills are key to identify the correct morphotype, to select the appropriate regenerative strategy and to put it into practice.
conclusionsThe identification of two morphotypes that contraindicate IIP is the first and most crucial step in the clinical decision-making process. Other morphotypes may be amenable to IIP, yet require comprehensive diagnosis, expertise, and surgical skills. Clinical studies are needed to validate the concepts presented in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.