ArticleChemistry, an Asian journal2026
Fabrication of Nanoporous Silica Membranes by Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition Using Porogen Approach.
Article in Chemistry, an Asian journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fabrication of Nanoporous Silica Membranes by Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition Using Porogen Approach.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of nanoporous membranes with high selectivity and stability is essential for advanced molecular separation. In this study, nanoporous silica membranes were fabricated via atmospheric-pressure plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (AP-PECVD), using hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) as the precursor and methyl methacrylate (MMA) as the porogen. The hybrid composite structure was precisely controlled by adjusting deposition parameters, including deposition temperature, HMDSO concentration, and MMA/HMDSO ratio. Subsequent thermal treatment at 400°C effectively removed the porogen, yielding stable nanoporous structures with pore sizes of approximately 1 nm. Nanofiltration performance was evaluated using solutes of different molecular weights. The membranes exhibited a sharp molecular weight cutoff (∼340 g/mol), with negligible rejection of azobenzene (182 g/mol) but strong rejection (> 95%) of Basic Red 2 (351 g/mol), Brilliant Blue R (826 g/mol), and vitamin B12 (1355 g/mol). The membranes maintained stable flux values in the range of 14-15.5 kg/(m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.