Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578409›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026

How can ethnobiology and ethnomedicine foster more applied and concrete solutions to safeguard medicinal systems of indigenous, Afro-descendant and local communities?

Guillaume Odonne, Sofia Zank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guillaume OdonneLEEISA CNRS Université de Guyane IFREMER , Cayenne, French Guiana. guillaume.odonne@cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-309X
Sofia ZankUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0779-423X

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche AIBSI: ANR-22-EXES-0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethnobiology and ethnomedicine have progressively shifted from utilitarian inventories toward more decolonized and inclusive approaches. Beyond their recognized contributions to biodiversity conservation and sustainable development, their role in global health remains insufficiently explored. This short opinion paper argues that ethnobiology and ethnomedicine offer key conceptual and methodological tools to improve health and well-being among Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant and Local Communities (IPADLC) by promoting a holistic understanding of health that integrates ecosystems, human and non-human beings, territories, and spiritual dimensions. Drawing on concepts such as One Health, global health, planetary health, and the ecology of health, we highlight how local medicinal systems articulate multiple scales of care, from individuals to multispecies communities and ecosystems. We discuss the complementarity and hybridization between biomedical and local medicinal systems, emphasizing the importance of cultural safety, women's empowerment, and methodological reflexivity in the study and integration of traditional remedies. Finally, we address the critical challenges surrounding the protection of local medicinal knowledge, intellectual property rights, and fair benefit-sharing in the context of growing industrial interest. We conclude that strengthening ethically grounded, community-centered ethnobiological research is essential for building more equitable, plural, and sustainable global health systems.

Indexed as

Medicine, TraditionalBlack PeopleHumansIndigenous PeoplesCultural safetyIntercultural healthLocal medicinal knowledgeLocal medicinal systems

Identifiers

PMID41578409
PMCPMC12849314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.