ArticleJournal of intensive care2026
Effects of two ventilator-weaning methods on lung volume and ventilation distribution by electrical impedance tomography in post-cardiac surgery patients: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thoracic electrical impedance tomography from technological promise to clinical reality: the Chinese experience.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Electrical impedance tomography-derived flow index during spontaneous breathing trial stratifies the risk of reintubation within 48 h after extubation.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe effect of different spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) methods on lung volume and ventilation distribution has not been well clarified in post-cardiac surgery patients.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, patients underwent 30 min of pressure-support ventilation (PSV)-SBT [PS 8 cmH
resultsIn 60 patients who complied with both SBT steps, 43 succeeded (71.7%) and 17 failed (28.3%) the T-piece SBT. Compared to the success group, the failure group exhibited a higher incidence of pendelluft (52.9% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.045) and significantly greater EELV
conclusionsThe successful weaning patients had a higher reduction of EELV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.