ArticleImplementation science communications2026
What counts as a core intervention component? Developing the Core-FAST (Fidelity and Adaptation for Scaling up Tool) plug-in.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile fidelity is a significant implementation outcome, the balance with adaptation has gained prominence when scaling up evidence-based interventions, to ensure equity in meeting local community needs within the resources available. Before undertaking adaptation of an evidence-based intervention, many fidelity/adaptation frameworks concur with the need to identify intervention 'core components' to facilitate replication. However, how to do this less clear. By creating a 'plug-in' tool, we sought to add value to existing theories, models and frameworks. The aim of this study was to co-design a plug-in tool - Core-FAST (Fidelity and Adaptation for Scaling up Tool)-to facilitate identification of core components when scaling up cancer care.
methodsWe employed a sequential, exploratory, multi-phase qualitative study in the context of cancer care to elicit in-depth perspectives from different collaborator groups: informed consumers (n = 10); cancer clinicians (n = 11); and implementation researchers (n = 11). Following a review of the literature, we used an inductive approach with two sequential activities: 1. Online workshops followed by 2. Tool development and review of Core-FAST. We employed inductive content analysis.
resultsEight themes were identified from the workshops ranging from core components to warranted variations of these components: 1)Establishing the implementation context; 2) Retaining active ingredients; 3) Patient safety; 4) Compliance with regulatory frameworks; 5) Alignment with organizations policy and regulatory frameworks; 6) Compatibility with local infrastructure; 7) Equity and; 8) Acceptability. A draft version of Core-FAST was developed and following review, the final version comprised of seven questions to ask of each intervention component to identify core components and those open to adaptation.
conclusionsCore-FAST proposes a pro-active method to prospectively identify which intervention components are non-negotiable, and must be retained, and those amenable to change, to support the equitable scale up and replication of evidence-based interventions. Future research is required to evaluate the extent to which Core-FAST enables efficient adaptation and identification of impact on intervention outcomes. The feasibility of applying Core-FAST to support decision-making should be investigated in further work including the co-design of an accessible version e.g., digital for use in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.