ReviewJournal of eating disorders2026
Eating disorders and disordered eating behaviour in older adults: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A neurodevelopmental model of eating disorder risk in midlife to older adulthood.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders (ED) and disordered eating behaviours (DEB) in older adults have important implications for physical morbidity and mortality. Thus far, there has been no attempt to systematically evaluate the research landscape of ED and DEB in older adults.
methodsA scoping review adhering to PRISMA-ScR reporting standards was conducted. We searched MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO (2000-2025) for English-language, peer-reviewed articles on ED/DEB in older adults covering diagnosis, epidemiology, determinants, clinical features, progression, or treatment, in any setting.
resultsA total of 53 publications were included in the final review, comprising four systematic reviews, five longitudinal studies, and 44 cross-sectional studies. All original studies were observational in design. Research was predominantly community-based and relied on single-step screening, limiting diagnostic validity. Healthcare facility-based studies have examined ED in patients with comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, and those undergoing bariatric surgery. Most study participants were Caucasian, with limited representation from minority groups. ED in older adults were mostly in women, with presentations characterised by dietary restriction, binge-purge behaviours, and body image preoccupation. The data on prevalence of subtypes of ED was variably reported. Most late-onset cases were precipitated by psychosocial stressors such as bereavement, caregiving responsibilities, or social isolation. Biological factors, particularly menopausal age in women, were found to be associated with an increased prevalence of DEBs, such as binge eating and restrictive eating patterns. Comorbid depression, anxiety, and medical conditions were frequent. Combined behavioural and pharmacological interventions offered better outcomes. Poorer outcomes were linked to chronicity, low body mass index, presence of comorbidities, and poor treatment engagement. Protective factors, including cognitive adaptation and positive attitudes toward ageing, may confer resilience.
conclusionED and DEB in older adults are a significant but underrecognized public health issue. Existing research is constrained by limited diversity, Western-centric samples, and reliance on self-reported measures, underscoring the urgent need for inclusive, longitudinal, and interventional studies that better capture biopsychosocial determinants of EDs and DEBs, while also promoting the provision of age-sensitive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.