ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2026
Urban welfare and family-oriented settlement intentions of China's floating population.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recent trend among China’s migrant population has been a preponderance of familial transitions; to promote the new urbanization process, this necessitates prompt and effective responses at the level of local policies and public services. By constructing a logit model and employing propensity score matching (PSM) analysis using data from the Health Commission’s China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) and the statistical yearbooks of the relevant localities, the determinants of the family-based mobile population’s propensity to settle down are investigated. (i) both exclusionary welfare and public welfare have a significant positive effect on the settlement intention of the family floating population as a whole; however, public welfare has a more robust explanatory capacity.The PSM results indicate that migrants in high public welfare cities exhibit a settlement intention approximately 11.8% points higher than those in low public welfare cities with similar characteristics. (ii) Following regional grouping, the influence of core variables on the migrant population’s intention to settle alters substantially, indicating that spatial heterogeneity analyses are required due to the obvious differences between regions. (iii) The settlement policy implemented by economically developed regions primarily hinders many family migrants. Specifically, these regions manipulate the settlement decision-making process of family migrants by establishing discriminatory institutional arrangements, thereby influencing population size and structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.