Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578346›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026

Ambulance patients with altered level of consciousness: a registry-based cohort study from the North Denmark Region in 2017-2021.

Amalie Rabjerg Rosenkvist, Christine Norup Engstrøm, Ida Bromell Kindberg, Terese Miang Engstrup, Erika Frischknecht Christensen, Henrik Bøggild, Tim Alex Lindskou

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amalie Rabjerg Rosenkvist *Centre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Christine Norup Engstrøm *Centre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ida Bromell Kindberg *Centre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Terese Miang EngstrupCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Erika Frischknecht ChristensenCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3673-9694
Henrik BøggildDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8934-5002
Tim Alex LindskouCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. tim.l@rn.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-7859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn altered level of consciousness (ALOC) in emergency patients is linked to poor outcomes. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), initially made for head injury patients, but often used in both trauma and other patients. GCS assesses consciousness, with scores ranging from 15 (fully aware) to 3 (deep coma). Assessing GCS is quickly done and does not require technical equipment, unlike other vital signs. This study aims to characterize unselected prehospital ALOC patients brought to a hospital and assess their mortality.

designRetrospective observational cohort study.

methodsPatients transported by ambulance to a hospital in the North Denmark Region between 2017 and 2021, with a first registered GCS of 3-14, were included. The reason for calling the emergency number, subsequent ICD-10 diagnoses given at hospital, and raw and adjusted mortality, were reported.

resultsFifteen thousand two hundred thirty-five patients were included. One in eight ambulance patients had ALOC, most with a GCS score of 14. The primary reason for calling the emergency number was decreased consciousness or paralysis, except for those with a GCS score of 3-8, where the most common reason was unconsciousness/possible cardiac arrest. Most patients received non-specific diagnoses at hospital, which covers a wide range of symptoms and abnormal findings. Those with a GCS score of 3, most frequently were diagnosed with circulatory diseases, especially cardiac arrest and more diverse diagnostic picture among the others, including trauma, strokes, syncope, seizures and poisoning as the most frequent. Among patients with a GCS score of 3, 60% had died within 30 days, whereas 10% had died among patients with a GCS score of 14. The odds of mortality increased as GCS scores decreased, with a decrease from 14 to 9-13 more than doubled the odds of dying (OR 2.3, p < 0.001).

conclusionAmong unselected prehospital emergency patients brought to a hospital, every eight had ALOC. The patient group was heterogenic concerning the reasons for calling the emergency number and diagnoses given at hospital. ALOC was associated with high 30 days mortality, including 10% for GCS of 14. ALOC, also in milder degree, is a serious sign in a broad prehospital patient population.

Indexed as

AmbulancesConsciousness DisordersEmergency Medical ServicesAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesAltered level of consciousnessEmergency Medical ServicesGlasgow Coma ScaleMortality

Identifiers

PMID41578346
PMCPMC12910908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.