Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578341›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2026

Prosthetic complications of implant-supported overdentures: a retrospective study on the influence of attachment type and implant number.

Ezgi Erdenol, Ecem Sancar, Ozge Celik, Selim Erkut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ezgi ErdenolPrivate Clinician, Ankara, Turkey.
Ecem SancarDepartment of Prosthodontics, Baskent University Faculty of Dentistry, 82nd Street, Bahçelievler/Çankaya, Ankara, 06490, Turkey. ecemyumusakbas@outlook.com.
Ozge CelikPrivate Clinician, Ankara, Turkey.
Selim ErkutDepartment of Prosthodontics, Baskent University Faculty of Dentistry, 82nd Street, Bahçelievler/Çankaya, Ankara, 06490, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the complications associated with implant-supported overdentures (IODs) by comparing splinted and unsplinted attachment systems with varying numbers of implants in the maxilla and mandible.

resultsA statistically significant difference in complication rates was found between splinted and unsplinted systems (p < 0.05), with unsplinted systems demonstrating higher rates. The number of implants did not significantly affect the incidence of complications (p > 0.05). During the first two years, deformation of the retentive part was the most common complication in all the groups. From the third year to the fifth year, four-implant systems more frequently exhibited retention loss and attachment wear, whereas two- and three-implant systems continued to show deformation of the retentive part.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, OverlayHumansMaxillaRetrospective StudiesDental ImplantsComplicationsDental implantsOverdenture

Identifiers

PMID41578341
PMCPMC12911100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.