SynthesisBMC medicine2026
Comparative effects of salt substitutes on blood pressure, cardiovascular events and mortality: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Universal Adoption of Salt-Substitution Matters for Blood Pressure Control: Collective Implementation, Greater Impact.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of potassium-containing low-sodium salt substitutes for cardiovascular disease prevention in mixed adult populations: an umbrella review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Salt substitutes may reduce sodium intake while maintaining palatability, but comparative effects across formulations remain uncertain.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in adults comparing salt substitutes with regular salt, other substitutes or no intervention. Databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CNKI, Wanfang), WHO-ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to Oct 3, 2025 (PROSPERO CRD42023451859). We assessed the risk of bias using a modified Cochrane tool and conducted a random-effects network meta-analysis, with evidence certainty evaluated through the GRADE approach.
resultsWe included 34 randomised controlled trials involving 37,063 participants across 15 countries (17 from China, 17 from other countries; mean age 62.3 years). Our results indicate that moderate-potassium and low-sodium salt substitutes (25-40% KCl, 60-79% NaCl) probably reduce all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal cardiovascular events and systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to regular salt, with reductions of 7-17 deaths per 1000 individuals and 4.39-4.64 mmHg for SBP, based on moderate to high certainty evidence. Mortality and cardiovascular benefits are predominantly driven by one large Chinese trial (SSaSS, n = 20,995); excluding this trial eliminated statistical significance for all-cause mortality. Among non-Chinese studies, none contributed mortality data. Substitutes with higher potassium or very low sodium showed similar blood pressure reductions but provided less certain evidence regarding mortality and events. No substitute increased adverse events or withdrawals, and acceptability was comparable to regular salt.
conclusionsSalt substitutes, particularly moderate-potassium and low-sodium formulations, represent a promising sodium reduction strategy. However, current evidence for mortality and cardiovascular event benefits is dominated by one large Chinese trial and has very limited generalisability beyond Chinese populations with high discretionary salt use. These products appear acceptable and safe in people without renal impairment, but clinicians should rule out kidney disease and hyperkalaemia risk before recommending them, and large trials in non-Chinese populations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.