Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578315›Full record

Trial reportInternational breastfeeding journal2026

Intentions, practices, and social representations regarding breastfeeding among women experiencing social disadvantage: findings from the qualitative component of the ECAIL trial.

Delphine Poquet, Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain, Delphine Ley, Marie-Aline Charles, Priscille Sauvegrain, Sandrine Lioret

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International breastfeeding journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03003117 (Effectiveness of an Early Intervention Aiming at Promoting Healthy Diet, Lifestyle and Growth of Children Living in Situation of Social Disadvantage), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03003117 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of an Early Intervention Aiming at Promoting Healthy Diet, Lifestyle and Growth of Children Living in Situation of Social Disadvantage : the prEgnanCy and eArly Childhood nutrItion triaL (ECAIL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrench Red CrossRan2017 to 2026Enrolled800ConditionsDiet, Growth, Infant, Physical ActivityArmsExperimental: Intervention Program, Active comparator: Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Delphine PoquetUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Inserm, Paris, F-75004, France.
Blandine de Lauzon-GuillainUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Inserm, Paris, F-75004, France.
Delphine LeyUniversité Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1286 - INFINITE - Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France.
Marie-Aline CharlesUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Inserm, Paris, F-75004, France.
Priscille Sauvegrain *Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Inserm, Paris, F-75004, France.
Sandrine Lioret *Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Inserm, Paris, F-75004, France. sandrine.lioret@inserm.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PrEgnanCy and eArly childhood nutrItion triaL (ECAIL) is a randomised controlled trial targeting socially disadvantaged families in northern France. It aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-level, family-based intervention starting from pregnancy that combines nutritional support with improved access to healthy foods to promote healthy feeding practices and lifestyle behaviours in children. This qualitative study explored breastfeeding (or chest feeding) intentions, practices, and social representations among 47 birthing parents (mothers) participating in the trial.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted in participants’ homes from April 2022 to May 2023 (Lille) and from February to June 2024 (Valenciennes). Interviews lasted an average of 61 min (SD 24; range 24–169) and were conducted when children were 16 to 26 months old. The interview guide drew on the three components of the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation). All interviews were manually transcribed verbatim and analysed in NVivo using thematic coding. An inter-coder reliability check was performed to ensure consistency.

resultsFour main themes emerged, broadly following the course of breastfeeding: intention, initiation, continuation, and cessation. Most mothers intended to breastfeed, motivated by perceived health benefits, emotional bonding, previous positive experiences, social support, family norms and religious beliefs. Women reported challenges during initiation and continuation, including pain, low milk supply, latching difficulties, fatigue, limited professional support after returning home, and social pressures, sometimes leading to frustration, guilt, or premature cessation. Participants highlighted advantages such as convenience, cost savings, and improved infant digestion and immunity. Workplace and logistical challenges were also reported, notably the lack of suitable spaces for milk expression.

conclusionThese findings highlight the need to address structural determinants—particularly social opportunity—to support breastfeeding in socially vulnerable contexts. Because of the difficulties encountered after postnatal discharge, early home visits combined with peer support may offer tailored guidance during a pivotal period and help strengthen maternal confidence. Improving the visibility and acceptability of breastfeeding in public and professional settings, and creating more welcoming environments, represents an important policy lever. In contexts where research on disadvantaged populations remains limited, these findings provide useful insight for developing targeted, context-sensitive lactation support strategies.

trial registrationClinical Trials.gov: NCT03003117, registered on 21 December 2016.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntentionMothersVulnerable PopulationsAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleFranceHumansInfantPregnancyQualitative ResearchBreastfeedingChest feedingInterventionPovertyProcess evaluationQualitative researchSocial norms

Identifiers

PMID41578315
PMCPMC12911340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.