Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578273›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Evaluation of the experience of people referred under the NHS enhanced service incentive for obesity to the NHS digital weight management programme: a mixed method study.

Simon Barrett, Stella Jp Haffner, Lorraine McSweeney, Charlotte Rothwell, Mackenzie Fong, Susan A Jebb, Tejal Indulkar, Katharine Taylor, Ashley J Adamson, Laura Heath and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simon BarrettPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. simon.barrett@newcastle.ac.uk.
Stella Jp HaffnerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lorraine McSweeneyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Charlotte RothwellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Mackenzie FongPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Susan A JebbNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tejal IndulkarNHS England, Wellington House, London, UK.
Katharine TaylorNHS England, Wellington House, London, UK.
Ashley J AdamsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Laura HeathNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Paul AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) North East and North Cumbria NIHR200173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternationally, guidelines recommend clinicians identify patients living with obesity and offer referral to weight management programmes, especially patients with related co-morbidities. In 2021, NHS England introduced the NHS Digital Weight Management Programme for people living with obesity and a diagnosis of hypertension or diabetes or both. The programme is offered at three levels of intensity with people triaged to the appropriate level determined through age, sex, ethnicity, and deprivation. The aim of this study was to assess the experiences of people referred to the programme.

methodsA mixed methods evaluation, involving questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with patients. Questionnaires were sent to everyone who registered and chose a preferred service Provider between March 2022 and June 2023, and responses are reported as proportions. Differences in health status, demographic characteristics and experience on the programme were assessed using ordinal logistic regression. A sample of patients were interviewed, and data were analysed using a framework.

results17,553 questionnaires were distributed, with 3885 (22.1%) completed. We interviewed 24 patients (27 to 79 years of age; 15 females, 9 males), who had various levels of support and rates of completion. The programme was reported to be easy to use, and around half of survey respondents felt the programme helped them change their diet or activity or improved their wellbeing, regardless of the level of support received. Participants from minority ethnic groups were less likely to describe the programme or the coaching as helpful in terms of changing behaviour. Interview participants valued weight tracking, goal setting, and meal planning, but some felt the service was too generic for their individual needs. Some participants reported they did not receive sufficient in-person or group support, and that online forums were not a suitable alternative. Around half of participants found coaching helpful, but some described the coaches as unresponsive or scripted.

conclusionThe NHS Digital Weight Management Programme was moderately well received by most participants, and facilitated weight loss, behaviour change, and continued engagement. It was less helpful for people from minority ethnic groups, and some participants wanted more frequent contact and greater personalization in interactions with health coaches.

Indexed as

ObesityReferral and ConsultationState MedicineWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultAgedDigital HealthEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMotivationProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchDigital interventionMixed methodsNHSObesityPatient experiencePreventionPublic healthTier 2 adult weight management

Identifiers

PMID41578273
PMCPMC12910902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.