ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Machine learning-based model for prediction of swallowing recovery in post-stroke patients.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPost-Stroke Dysphagia (PSD), as a common complication of cerebrovascular accidents, seriously affects patients’ quality of life and prognosis. This retrospective study aims to provide a reliable machine learning model for predicting the prognostic factors of PSD.
methodsThe clinical data from patients admitted to the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2021 to December 2023 were collected. The dataset was chronologically split into a training set (January 2021-May 2023, n = 377) and a temporal validation set (June-December 2023, n = 91). Feature variables selection was performed using correlation analysis and logistic regression. Five machine learning models were developed and evaluated and subsequently evaluated on the temporal validation set using precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsEight feature variables were selected for model construction. On the temporal validation set, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) demonstrated the best performance with a precision of 0.937, recall of 0.795, F1-score of 0.863, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.940. During 5-fold cross-validation on the training set, Random Forest (RF) achieved the highest average AUC (0.949), but its performance decreased to 0.890 on the temporal validation set. The superior performance of GBDT on the temporal validation set indicates its stronger generalization capability compared to other models.
conclusionsThe GBDT model showed robust performance on the temporal validation set, suggesting its potential clinical utility for predicting swallowing function recovery in post-stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.