Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578257›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Relationship between attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance, mentalization ability, and various digital addictions: a cross-sectional study among university students.

Lara Antonia Jasper, Henrik Bischoff, Christiane Eichenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lara Antonia JasperFaculty of Psychology, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria.
Henrik BischoffFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Psychosomatics, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria.
Christiane EichenbergFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Psychosomatics, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria. christiane.eichenberg@sfu.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing prevalence of digital media use has been accompanied by a rise in behavioral addictions, such as smartphone and social media addiction. Theoretical models based on attachment theory suggest that insecure attachment styles, particularly attachment anxiety and avoidance, may predispose individuals to maladaptive digital behaviors as a form of affect- and relationship regulation. In addition, mentalization theory posits that the ability to understand one’s own and others’ mental states serves as a protective factor in affect- and relationship regulation. However, little is known about how mentalization ability interacts with attachment insecurities in predicting digital addictions. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study examines the relationship between attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, mentalization ability, and digital addictions among students in Germany and Austria. Specifically, it analyzes whether mentalization ability moderates the relationship between attachment insecurities and digital addictions.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with N = 324 students from Germany and Austria. Participants completed questionnaires assessing their attachment style (ECR-RD), mentalization ability (MZQ-6), and forms of digital addiction (smartphone, social media). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine main effects and interaction terms, testing moderation models.

resultsAttachment anxiety emerged as a robust predictor of both forms of digital addiction, particularly social media addiction. Attachment avoidance was also significantly associated with digital addiction but to a lesser extent. Crucially, mentalization ability moderated the association between attachment avoidance and social media addiction, such that individuals with high avoidance and low mentalization were most vulnerable. DISCUSSION: These findings support the integration of attachment theory and mentalization theory in understanding digital addictions. The results highlight that mentalization ability may buffer the adverse effects of attachment avoidance, suggesting that interventions targeting both attachment dynamics and mentalization skills could enhance prevention and treatment efforts. Future studies should further explore this interaction using longitudinal and clinical designs.

Indexed as

AnxietyBehavior, AddictiveInternet Addiction DisorderMentalizationObject AttachmentSocial MediaStudentsAdolescentAdultAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesDigital MediaFemaleGermanyHumansMaleAttachmentDigital addictionMentalization abilitySmartphone addictionSocial media addiction

Identifiers

PMID41578257
PMCPMC12922306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.