SynthesisBMC psychiatry2026
A systematic review of participatory research involving forensic mental health patients.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Developing forensic patient-oriented research guidelines: a rapid review using an integrated knowledge translation approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- "What about that violence?" Transforming the discourse on violence in mental health research and services.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is currently limited information and guidance on utilising participatory research within forensic mental health settings. This systematic review aimed to explore the use of participatory research within those settings, identify helpful practices, barriers and challenges, as well as explore the impact reported of participatory research in research and knowledge production. Fourteen studies and eleven other types of publications have been identified from electronic databases, PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and ProQuest and hand searches of academic journals. Thematic analysis was used for synthesising data collected. Four themes were identified: (1) Building equal relationships, (2) Speaking the same language, (3) An involving system, (4) Impact for all. Analysis showed that the use of participatory research in such settings relies on human interaction and equal co-production within commonly restrictive and coercive environments. The complexity of participatory research is also reflected in its reporting. A standardised (but also flexible) model of reporting would be valuable for future research. In addition to summarizing the findings of research in this area, we have compiled a list of ‘active ingredients’ for the successful use of participatory research in forensic mental health settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.