Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578208›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026

Patterns of use of oral antivirals for COVID-19 in people 70 years and over in Victoria, Australia: a linked data study.

Laura J Edwards, Anish Scaria, Allen C Cheng, Janaki Amin, Elizabeth J Robinson, Caroline Sumpton, Bette Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura J EdwardsSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia. laura.j.edwards@unsw.edu.au.
Anish ScariaNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, Australia.
Allen C ChengInfectious Diseases, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Janaki AminDepartment of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Elizabeth J RobinsonDepartment of Health, Victoria, Australia.
Caroline SumptonDepartment of Health, Victoria, Australia.
Bette LiuSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo oral antivirals for treatment of COVID-19 are available in Australia, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, which is recommended, and molnupiravir, which is approved for use when nirmatrelvir-ritonavir is contraindicated. From 2022 to 2024, over 1.5 million Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) prescriptions were dispensed. We examined dispensing of antivirals in people aged 70 + years in Victoria, Australia, from July 2022 to April 2023.

methodsWe linked COVID-19 notifications in residents of Victoria (population 6.6 million) aged 70 + years to data from the Australian 2021 Census of Population and Housing, Australian Immunisation Register, PBS and Medicare Benefits Scheme. We examined trends over time and compared the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of people who received antivirals with those who received no treatment, according to the type of antiviral received. We also estimated the proportion of people that received molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir who had a pharmacological contraindication to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.

resultsAmong 76,120 people aged 70 + years with a COVID-19 notification, 50,005 (66%) received an antiviral with 37,101 (74%) receiving molnupiravir. The proportion of people that received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir increased during the study period from 19% (1957/10,256) in July 2022 to 35% (720/2075) in April 2023. After adjusting for age and sex, characteristics associated with receipt of antivirals included RACF residence, higher income and higher education. Compared to molnupiravir, receipt of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was greater in those with higher incomes, higher education and no COVID-19 vaccine booster in the last 6 months. The majority of people who received molnupiravir (25,378/37101;68%) did not have a category 1 pharmacological contraindication to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.

conclusionsDuring the study period, most COVID-19 cases in Victoria received antivirals but variations according to age, sex, socioeconomic status, residence in aged care and vaccination suggest that further efforts to identify barriers and enablers to treatment are warranted. Our findings also suggest that pharmacological contraindications to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir are not the primary reason for prescribing molnupiravir.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19CytidineDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansHydroxylaminesMaleProlineRitonavirSARS-CoV-2VictoriaAntiviral AgentsCytidineDrug CombinationsHydroxylaminesmolnupiravirProlineRitonavirAntiviral agentsCOVID-19MolnupiravirNirmatrelvir-ritonavirSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41578208
PMCPMC12918484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.