ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
Evaluation of statistical methods in R for estimating intervention effects using segmented linear regression in the AB interrupted time series design.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interrupted Time Series (ITS) designs are commonly used to estimate intervention effects in public health, epidemiology, clinical psychology, and many other fields. A common type of ITS design analyzed in time-series studies is the AB design for which there is one baseline phase and one intervention phase. Segmented linear regression is frequently used to estimate the causal effect of an intervention, allowing for the assessment of both immediate and delayed post-treatment effects. Many methods are available to estimate such models in R, but little guidance is available for researchers. We summarized ten available methods in R for estimating intervention effects in ITS and evaluated the performance of these methods to recover lag-1 autoregressive process (AR(1)) and change estimates at three time points post-intervention via a Monte Carlo Simulation study. The methods that had the least biased estimates of the lag-1 autoregressive effect with adequate Type I error rates and the highest statistical power were Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) performed in the package nlme and doubly-robust ordinary least squares performed in the package Dbfit. We therefore recommend researchers use one of these methods when estimating intervention effects in AB ITS design, especially in relatively short time series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.