Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578115›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Bridging production and protection: Legislative and technical feasibility of continuous cover forestry around freshwater in Sweden.

Irina Mancheva, Alejandro Gándara, Luis Andrés Guillén, Lenka Kuglerová, Anneli M Ågren, Francisco X Aguilar, Eliza Maher Hasselquist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irina ManchevaDepartment of Political Science, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. irina.mancheva@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5582-9877
Alejandro GándaraDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Studies (SLU), Skogsmarksgränd 17, 90183, Umeå, Sweden.
Luis Andrés GuillénSouthern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Studies (SLU), Sundsvägen 3, 234 56, Alnarp, Sweden.
Lenka KuglerováDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Studies (SLU), Skogsmarksgränd 17, 90183, Umeå, Sweden.
Anneli M ÅgrenDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Studies (SLU), Skogsmarksgränd 17, 90183, Umeå, Sweden.
Francisco X AguilarDepartment of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Studies (SLU), Skogsmarksgränd 17, 90183, Umeå, Sweden.
Eliza Maher HasselquistDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Studies (SLU), Skogsmarksgränd 17, 90183, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2022-02107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forests are essential to the global green transition, but intensified management may undermine environmental goals. Continuous cover forestry (CCF) offers an alternative, balancing timber production and ecosystem conservation. We investigated the legislative and technical feasibility of CCF in riparian buffers along freshwaters, where it could potentially restore simplified stands and better protect water. We analyzed EU, national, and global policies identifying barriers and enablers and used GIS data from 11 Swedish sites estimating the share of productive forest converted to CCF under varying buffer widths. Results show CCF in riparian buffers is feasible, with few legislative barriers and several soft enablers. The EU Nature Restoration Regulation is a key enabler, as CCF-managed buffers can contribute to restoration targets, providing opportunities for different property sizes to meet multiple management objectives. Future feasibility depends on EU member states' implementation of the regulation and alignment of ecological goals with political and economic conditions.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForestsFresh WaterSwedenContinuous cover forestry (CCF)EU Nature Restoration RegulationForest riparian buffersLand-use policy goalsLegislative feasibilityTechnical feasibility

Identifiers

PMID41578115
PMCPMC13319281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.