Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578107›Full record

ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2026

Updating Primary Care for an Urgent Care World.

Claire F Price, Daniel I Steinberg, Matthew A Weissman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claire F PriceMaimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA. cfprice@maimo.org.ORCID 0009-0004-3893-0964
Daniel I SteinbergMaimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.
Matthew A WeissmanMaimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urgent care has rapidly expanded as a convenient alternative to both emergency departments and traditional primary care. Patients increasingly choose urgent care for its accessibility, shorter wait times, and flexibility. However, this shift exposes critical shortcomings in primary care-including barriers to scheduling and diminishing after-hours availability. As patients bypass primary care, they miss out on longitudinal relationships and high-value comprehensive care, which not only threatens health outcomes but contributes to rising healthcare costs. To remain relevant, primary care must adapt by integrating the convenience and responsiveness that patients seek in urgent care. This includes modern scheduling systems, virtual and team-based visits, and in-house diagnostics. As guiding principles in this shift, primary care should remain anchored by what defines it: first contact, longitudinality, continuity, comprehensiveness, coordination, person-centeredness, and community orientation. Rather than resist change, primary care must evolve to meet patients' current day demands. Doing so could revitalize the field and reaffirm its essential role in the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CarePrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumans

Identifiers

PMID41578107
PMCPMC13083702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.